[GNUnet-SVN] r945 - GNUnet-docs/WWW/test

[durner]

Author: durner
Date: 2005-06-14 13:33:39 -0700 (Tue, 14 Jun 2005)
New Revision: 945

Modified:
   GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/encoding.php3
   GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/namespace.php3
Log:
fixes

Modified: GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/encoding.php3
===================================================================
--- GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/encoding.php3  2005-06-14 20:30:58 UTC (rev 944)
+++ GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/encoding.php3  2005-06-14 20:33:39 UTC (rev 945)
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 HR();
 BR();BR();
 H3("The new implementation");
-BP()
+BP();
 W("The good news is, that except for re-synchronizing the stream, the new 
implementation addresses all problems noted above.");
 W("The new encoding encrypts every 1k block using the hash of the block, 
called the key-hash (Ripe160, Blowfish) and stores that block under the hash of 
the encrypted block, called the query-hash (straight forward Freenet style 
CHK).");
 W("The IBlock above then contains both the key-hash and the query-hash.");

Modified: GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/namespace.php3
===================================================================
--- GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/namespace.php3 2005-06-14 20:30:58 UTC (rev 944)
+++ GNUnet-docs/WWW/test/namespace.php3 2005-06-14 20:33:39 UTC (rev 945)
@@ -195,13 +195,13 @@
 W("To insert several files, protected via subspace");
 EP();
 echo "<ol><li>\n";
-BP();
 W("Insert all files regularly (keys optional), and remember their 
RootNodeHeaders.");
 echo "</li><li>\n";
 W("Create and insert a list of previously inserted files as Directory using 
the RootNodeHeaders as its blocks");
 echo "</li><li>\n";
 W("Insert an SBlock pointing to the inserted Directory.");
 echo "</li></ol>\n";
+BP();
 W("Optionally, the Directory can also be inserted as a regular file under 
chosen keywords and with the appropriate meta-data.");
 
 EP();
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
 W("It also would allow pointing to future SBlocks.");
 W("With a content-based identifier we would have to know the content 
beforehand.");
 W("Reducing human error would be good, but is it worth preventing links to 
future?");
-P();
+BR();BR();
 W("Thus the best solution is to do both.");
 W("If the user does not specify a name, the system can compute one and provide 
a name that is guaranteed to be unique.");
 W("But if the user wants to have a specific name, that is also possible.");