gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] r2368 - GNUnet-docs/WWW/news


From: grothoff
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] r2368 - GNUnet-docs/WWW/news
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:03:35 -0800 (PST)

Author: grothoff
Date: 2005-12-22 07:03:33 -0800 (Thu, 22 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 2368

Added:
   GNUnet-docs/WWW/news/news_20051224.inc
Log:
draft

Added: GNUnet-docs/WWW/news/news_20051224.inc
===================================================================
--- GNUnet-docs/WWW/news/news_20051224.inc      2005-12-22 06:06:51 UTC (rev 
2367)
+++ GNUnet-docs/WWW/news/news_20051224.inc      2005-12-22 15:03:33 UTC (rev 
2368)
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<?php
+W("Download %s here.",
+  extlink_("http://gnunet.org/download/GNUnet-0.7.0b.tar.bz2";,
+          "GNUnet 0.7.0b"));
+W("gnunet-gtk is a separate download and can be found %s.",
+  extlink_("http://gnunet.org/download/gnunet-gtk-0.7.0b.tar.bz2";,
+          "here"));
+BR();
+W("This is a bugfix release for 0.7.0a.");
+W("It fixes various minor bugs:");
+echo "<ul>";
+LI("The UDP transports did not properly work if sender and receiver used 
different MTUs.");
+LI("Files of 0 bytes failed to download.");
+LI("An integer overflow limited the local datastore to 4 GB modulo 4 GB.");
+LI("and other minor details");
+echo "</ul>";
+W("However, the most important improvements for 0.7.0b are in the area of 
resource consumption.");
+W("Not only should 0.7.0b use significantly less processor time, but also the 
memory use should stabilize at a much lower level.");
+W("Depending on your configuration, 0.7.0b could be as much as 10 times more 
efficient in terms of memory footprint and processor time compared with 
0.7.0a.");
+?>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]