[GNUnet-SVN] r25681 - in gnunet-java: . doc

[gnunet]

Author: grothoff
Date: 2013-01-03 15:22:34 +0100 (Thu, 03 Jan 2013)
New Revision: 25681

Modified:
   gnunet-java/ISSUES
   gnunet-java/doc/voting.pdf
   gnunet-java/doc/voting.tex
Log:
-answers

Modified: gnunet-java/ISSUES
===================================================================
--- gnunet-java/ISSUES  2013-01-03 14:05:22 UTC (rev 25680)
+++ gnunet-java/ISSUES  2013-01-03 14:22:34 UTC (rev 25681)
@@ -43,14 +43,16 @@
 * Jan 02 22:03:52-356968 core-api-22511 INFO (Re)connecting to CORE service, 
monitoring messages of type 0
  * how does that make sense?
 
+
 * IBF hash function: there's no need to have a cryptographic hash, as no 
randomization is possible,
   and the domain of the hash function actually is really small. To find one 
collision on an IBF with n buckets, on average
   we only have to try n random values, there's no need to find a SHA-256 
collision
+  fine.
 
-* when the client violates the protocol, what should the service do?
- * most services use GNUNET_break?
+* when the client violates the protocol, what should the service do? Hang up 
(close TCP connection), keep going.
+ * most services use GNUNET_break? Yes.
  * which is not very helful, as developers for other bindings (e.g. java ;) 
have to look up the right line in the c code,
-   with no error message
+   with no error message; that's what you have the file name and line number 
for!
 
-* GNUNET_APPLICATION_TYPE_END obvious, but not documented
+* GNUNET_APPLICATION_TYPE_END obvious, but not documented -- eh, it is.
 

Modified: gnunet-java/doc/voting.pdf
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)

Modified: gnunet-java/doc/voting.tex
===================================================================
--- gnunet-java/doc/voting.tex  2013-01-03 14:05:22 UTC (rev 25680)
+++ gnunet-java/doc/voting.tex  2013-01-03 14:22:34 UTC (rev 25681)
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
   $\xleftarrow{c}$ & $c \in_R Z_q$ \\ \\
 
     $r_2 \leftarrow w - \alpha d_2$ & $r_1 \leftarrow w - \alpha d_1$ &
-    $\xrightarrow{d_1,d_2,r_1,r_2}$ & $c \? d_1 + d_2$ \\
+    $\xrightarrow{d_1,d_2,r_1,r_2}$ & $c \; \? d_1 + d_2$ \\
     \multicolumn{3}{c}{} & $a_1 \? g^{r1} x^{d_1}$ \\
     \multicolumn{3}{c}{} & $b_1 \? h^{r1} (yG)^{d_1}$ \\
     \multicolumn{3}{c}{} & $a_2 \? g^{r2} x^{d_2}$ \\