gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] [gnunet-texinfo] branch master updated: fix indent


From: gnunet
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] [gnunet-texinfo] branch master updated: fix indent
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:16:26 +0200

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository gnunet-texinfo.

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new d933a7d  fix indent
d933a7d is described below

commit d933a7d1ec2b90a2fcd58b353ad4d27088807c7c
Author: Christian Grothoff <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 15 21:43:11 2017 +0200

    fix indent
---
 developer.texi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/developer.texi b/developer.texi
index 939455e..ceffaaa 100644
--- a/developer.texi
+++ b/developer.texi
@@ -764,9 +764,15 @@ is used if the method for advancing in the loop is not a 
straightforward
 increment operation. In particular, we use:@
 
 @example
-next = head; while (NULL != (pos = next)) @{ next = pos->next; if (!
-should_free (pos)) continue; GNUNET_CONTAINER_DLL_remove (head, tail, pos);
-GNUNET_free (pos); @}
+next = head;
+while (NULL != (pos = next))
address@hidden
+  next = pos->next;
+  if (! should_free (pos))
+    continue;
+  GNUNET_CONTAINER_DLL_remove (head, tail, pos);
+  GNUNET_free (pos);
address@hidden
 @end example
 
 
@@ -776,8 +782,11 @@ simple @code{for} paradigm of @code{for(INIT;TEST;INC)}). 
However, for loops
 that do follow the simple @code{for} paradigm we do use @code{for}, even if it
 involves linked lists:
 @example
-/* simple iteration over a linked list */ for
-(pos = head; NULL != pos; pos = pos->next) @{ use (pos); @}
+/* simple iteration over a linked list */
+for (pos = head; NULL != pos; pos = pos->next)
address@hidden
+   use (pos);
address@hidden
 @end example
 
 
@@ -801,14 +810,17 @@ using deeply nested @code{if} statements. However, except 
for addition and
 multiplication, all operators should use parens. This is fine:@
 
 @example
-if ( (1 == foo) || ((0 == bar) && (x != y)) ) return x;
+if ( (1 == foo) || ((0 == bar) && (x != y)) )
+  return x;
 @end example
 
 
 However, this is not:
 @example
-if (1 == foo) return x; if (0 == bar && x != y)
-return x;
+if (1 == foo)
+  return x;
+if (0 == bar && x != y)
+  return x;
 @end example
 
 

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]