[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNUnet-SVN] [taler-merchant] branch master updated: todo was imported i
From: |
gnunet |
Subject: |
[GNUnet-SVN] [taler-merchant] branch master updated: todo was imported into the bug tracker |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:26:49 +0200 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository merchant.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 45daded todo was imported into the bug tracker
45daded is described below
commit 45dadeda49dcabd2b0346a7d70d628542254fc5d
Author: Christian Grothoff <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Tue Oct 24 00:26:46 2017 +0200
todo was imported into the bug tracker
---
TODO | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
deleted file mode 100644
index cffc334..0000000
--- a/TODO
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-Major issues with /pay:
-
-1) Why is there a 'paid' field in merchant_contract_terms DB table?
-
-2) If we do have the row_id of merchant_contract_terms, why do we store
- the full h_contract_terms/merchant_pub again and again in the other tables?
-
-3) What happens if we store in merchant_transactions some timestamp/exchange
- and then the deposits (partially) fail? Do we undo the deposits? Do we
- allow a 2nd round of /pay? What happens if the exchange differs the 2nd
time?
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [GNUnet-SVN] [taler-merchant] branch master updated: todo was imported into the bug tracker,
gnunet <=