[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lsd0001] branch master updated: attempt clarify supplemental #2
|
From: |
gnunet |
|
Subject: |
[lsd0001] branch master updated: attempt clarify supplemental #2 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 19:44:04 +0100 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
martin-schanzenbach pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lsd0001.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new bdfea14 attempt clarify supplemental #2
bdfea14 is described below
commit bdfea14f7efe6c9f6a130461da085b1aed7a50f8
Author: Martin Schanzenbach <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Sat Feb 15 19:40:11 2020 +0100
attempt clarify supplemental #2
---
draft-schanzen-gns.html | 21 +++---
draft-schanzen-gns.txt | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
draft-schanzen-gns.xml | 21 +++---
3 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
diff --git a/draft-schanzen-gns.html b/draft-schanzen-gns.html
index 11a1bb8..4a1e86f 100644
--- a/draft-schanzen-gns.html
+++ b/draft-schanzen-gns.html
@@ -2341,32 +2341,37 @@ table {
<figure id="figure-14">
<div class="artwork art-text alignLeft" id="section-6.2.6-3.1">
<pre>
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Alice
+ NICK: eve
</pre>
</div>
<figcaption><a href="#figure-14" class="selfRef">Figure
14</a></figcaption></figure>
<p id="section-6.2.6-4">
In this example, the returned NICK record is non-supplemental.
For the client, this means that the NICK belongs to the zone
- "alice.bob" and is published under the empty label along with an A
- record. In contrast, if the resolution yields the following:<a
href="#section-6.2.6-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+ "alice.doe" and is published under the empty label along with an A
+ record. The NICK record should be interpreted as: The zone defined by
+ "alice.doe" wants to be referred to as "eve".
+ In contrast, consider the following:<a href="#section-6.2.6-4"
class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
<figure id="figure-15">
<div class="artwork art-text alignLeft" id="section-6.2.6-5.1">
<pre>
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Bob (Supplemental)
+ NICK: john (Supplemental)
</pre>
</div>
<figcaption><a href="#figure-15" class="selfRef">Figure
15</a></figcaption></figure>
<p id="section-6.2.6-6">
In this case, the NICK record is marked as supplemental. This means that
- the NICK record belongs to the zone "bob" and is published under the
- label "alice" along with an A record.<a href="#section-6.2.6-6"
class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+ the NICK record belongs to the zone "doe" and is published under the
+ label "alice" along with an A record. The NICK record should be
+ interpreted as: The zone defined by "doe" wants to be referred to as
+ "john". This distinction is likely useful for other records published as
+ supplemental.<a href="#section-6.2.6-6" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
</section>
</div>
</section>
diff --git a/draft-schanzen-gns.txt b/draft-schanzen-gns.txt
index d6aa536..a0010df 100644
--- a/draft-schanzen-gns.txt
+++ b/draft-schanzen-gns.txt
@@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ Table of Contents
6.2.4. BOX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.2.5. VPN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.2.6. Supplemental Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
- 7. Zone Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
- 8. Determining the Root Zone and Zone Governance . . . . . . . . 20
+ 7. Zone Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
+ 8. Determining the Root Zone and Zone Governance . . . . . . . . 21
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
11. Test Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
12. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
- Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
+ Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1. Introduction
@@ -1025,39 +1025,39 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
record allows the client to match the record to the authoritative
zone. Consider the following example:
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Alice
+ NICK: eve
Figure 14
In this example, the returned NICK record is non-supplemental. For
- the client, this means that the NICK belongs to the zone "alice.bob"
- and is published under the empty label along with an A record. In
- contrast, if the resolution yields the following:
+ the client, this means that the NICK belongs to the zone "alice.doe"
+ and is published under the empty label along with an A record. The
+ NICK record should be interpreted as: The zone defined by "alice.doe"
+ wants to be referred to as "eve". In contrast, consider the
+ following:
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Bob (Supplemental)
+ NICK: john (Supplemental)
Figure 15
In this case, the NICK record is marked as supplemental. This means
- that the NICK record belongs to the zone "bob" and is published under
- the label "alice" along with an A record.
+ that the NICK record belongs to the zone "doe" and is published under
+ the label "alice" along with an A record. The NICK record should be
+ interpreted as: The zone defined by "doe" wants to be referred to as
+ "john". This distinction is likely useful for other records
+ published as supplemental.
+
+
+
-7. Zone Revocation
- Whenever a recursive resolver encounters a new GNS zone, it MUST
- check against the local revocation list whether the respective zone
- key has been revoked. If the zone key was revoked, the resolution
- MUST fail with an empty result set.
- In order to revoke a zone key, a signed revocation object SHOULD be
- published. This object MUST be signed using the private zone key.
- The revocation object is flooded in the overlay network. To prevent
@@ -1066,6 +1066,16 @@ Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020
[Page 19]
Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+7. Zone Revocation
+
+ Whenever a recursive resolver encounters a new GNS zone, it MUST
+ check against the local revocation list whether the respective zone
+ key has been revoked. If the zone key was revoked, the resolution
+ MUST fail with an empty result set.
+
+ In order to revoke a zone key, a signed revocation object SHOULD be
+ published. This object MUST be signed using the private zone key.
+ The revocation object is flooded in the overlay network. To prevent
flooding attacks, the revocation message MUST contain a proof-of-
work. The revocation message including the proof-of-work MAY be
calculated ahead of time to support timely revocation.
@@ -1103,6 +1113,15 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
p := 2 /* Parallelization parameter */
dkLen := 512 /* Intended output length */
+
+
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 20]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
The above function is called with different values for the "NONCE" in
"REVDAT" until the amount of leading zeroes is greater or equal 25.
@@ -1114,14 +1133,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
points to a local or remote start zone key. A resolver client may
also determine the start zone from the suffix of the name given for
resolution or using information retrieved out of band. The
-
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 20]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
governance model of any zone is at the sole discretion of the zone
owner. However, the choice of start zone(s) is at the sole
discretion of the local system administrator or user.
@@ -1153,6 +1164,20 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
locally managed zone matches the suffix of the name to be resolved,
resolution SHOULD start from the respective local zone:
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 21]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
Example name: www.example.gnu
Local zones:
fr = (d0,zk0)
@@ -1169,15 +1194,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
".". If multiple suffixes match the name to resolve, the longest
matching suffix MUST BE used. The suffix length of two results
cannot be equal, as this would indicate a misconfiguration. If both
-
-
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 21]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
a locally managed zone and a configuration entry exist for the same
suffix, the locally managed zone MUST have priority.
@@ -1211,6 +1227,13 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
f89333903b284fe8
1878bf47f3b39da0
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 22]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
zk (public zone key) :=
dff911496d025d7e
0885c03d19153e99
@@ -1227,13 +1250,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
6668e9f684f4dc33
6d656b27392b0fee
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 22]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
d_h :=
01fb61f482c17633
77611c4c2509e0f3
@@ -1266,6 +1282,14 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
3425e8a811ae59d2
99e2747285d2a479
+
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 23]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
TWOFISH_IV :=
071be189a9d236f9
b4a3654bb8c281d4
@@ -1282,14 +1306,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
00000000
-
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 23]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
RRBLOCK :=
055cb070e05fe6de SIGNATURE
ad694a50e5b4dedd
@@ -1321,6 +1337,15 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
STD 13, RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1034>.
+
+
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 24]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
[RFC1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,
November 1987, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.
@@ -1339,13 +1364,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 24]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
[RFC3826] Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the
SNMP User-based Security Model", RFC 3826,
@@ -1376,6 +1394,14 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
Algorithm (ECDSA)", RFC 6979, DOI 10.17487/RFC6979, August
2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6979>.
+
+
+
+Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 25]
+
+Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
+
+
[RFC7748] Langley, A., Hamburg, M., and S. Turner, "Elliptic Curves
for Security", RFC 7748, DOI 10.17487/RFC7748, January
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7748>.
@@ -1394,14 +1420,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
Authors' Addresses
-
-
-
-Schanzenbach, et al. Expires 13 May 2020 [Page 25]
-
-Internet-Draft The GNU Name System November 2019
-
-
Martin Schanzenbach
GNUnet e.V.
Boltzmannstrasse 3
@@ -1432,24 +1450,6 @@ Internet-Draft The GNU Name System
November 2019
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
diff --git a/draft-schanzen-gns.xml b/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
index da0ead1..e75a815 100644
--- a/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
+++ b/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
@@ -1090,30 +1090,35 @@
</t>
<figure>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Alice
+ NICK: eve
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>
In this example, the returned NICK record is non-supplemental.
For the client, this means that the NICK belongs to the zone
- "alice.bob" and is published under the empty label along with an A
- record. In contrast, if the resolution yields the following:
+ "alice.doe" and is published under the empty label along with an A
+ record. The NICK record should be interpreted as: The zone defined by
+ "alice.doe" wants to be referred to as "eve".
+ In contrast, consider the following:
</t>
<figure>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
- Query: alice.bob (type=A)
+ Query: alice.doe (type=A)
Result:
A: 1.2.3.4
- NICK: Bob (Supplemental)
+ NICK: john (Supplemental)
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>
In this case, the NICK record is marked as supplemental. This means that
- the NICK record belongs to the zone "bob" and is published under the
- label "alice" along with an A record.
+ the NICK record belongs to the zone "doe" and is published under the
+ label "alice" along with an A record. The NICK record should be
+ interpreted as: The zone defined by "doe" wants to be referred to as
+ "john". This distinction is likely useful for other records published as
+ supplemental.
</t>
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
address@hidden.
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [lsd0001] branch master updated: attempt clarify supplemental #2,
gnunet <=