[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lsd0001] branch master updated: update slides
From: |
gnunet |
Subject: |
[lsd0001] branch master updated: update slides |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2020 21:33:22 +0200 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
martin-schanzenbach pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lsd0001.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new cd861f4 update slides
cd861f4 is described below
commit cd861f43f674190230d04acb57c817dfceb52ecd
Author: Martin Schanzenbach <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
AuthorDate: Sat Jul 25 21:27:25 2020 +0200
update slides
---
ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex b/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex
index 88999b0..00c9151 100644
--- a/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex
+++ b/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
\begin{itemize}
\item Identity management: \textbf{re:claimID}
(\url{https://reclaim-identity.io})
\item Social Networks: \textbf{SecuShare} (\url{https://secushare.org})
- \item Healthcare: \textbf{Accident insurance and private health
data}.\footnote{Joint work with FH Bern, ``Decentralized Authentication for
Self-Sovereign Identities using Name Systems'' (DASEIN)}
+ \item Healthcare and IoT: \textbf{Accident insurance and private health
data}.\footnote{Joint work with University of Applied Sciences Bern,
``Decentralized Authentication for Self-Sovereign Identities using Name
Systems'' (DASEIN)}
\item Others: \textbf{Chat}, \textbf{Host addressing}, \ldots
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
@@ -152,20 +152,18 @@
\begin{itemize}
\item Address received feedback:
\begin{itemize}
- \item Better trust agility to address questions on choice of
Hierarchical Deterministic Key Derivation (HKDF). Options:
+ \item Better trust agility to address questions on choice of
Hierarchical Deterministic Key Derivation (HKDF). No "standard" go-to HKDF
exists at this time:
\begin{itemize}
- \item ECDSA w/ Cuve25519 (in draft)
- \item Schnorr/Ed25519 (``Tor-style'')
- \item BIP32-Ed25519\footnote{Has issues:
\url{https://forum.web3.foundation/t/key-recovery-attack-on-bip32-ed25519/44}}
+ \item In draft and implemented: ECDSA (RFC6979) over Curve25519
(RFC8031).
+ \item Alternatives: Schnorr/Ed25519-based
(``Tor-style'').\footnote{BIP32-Ed25519 has issues:
\url{https://forum.web3.foundation/t/key-recovery-attack-on-bip32-ed25519/44}}
\end{itemize}
\item Update to symmetric encryption scheme for IND-CCA.
- \item Address choice of DHT better.
- \item Address key management / recovery.
+ \item Address other feedback.
\end{itemize}
\item Desired next steps at IETF:
\begin{itemize}
\item Receive feedback from IETF experts on protocol and document.
- \item Is this document interesting to any existing IETF/IRTF WG?
+ \item Is this document interesting to any existing IETF/IRTF WG?
Should/can a new WG be formed?
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.