[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[taler-docs] branch master updated: rewording ISO20022 critique
From: |
gnunet |
Subject: |
[taler-docs] branch master updated: rewording ISO20022 critique |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:13:35 +0200 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
ms pushed a commit to branch master
in repository docs.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 0060905 rewording ISO20022 critique
0060905 is described below
commit 00609057f29f4335f3028e057c1425a4ef003db7
Author: MS <ms@taler.net>
AuthorDate: Thu Sep 22 11:13:30 2022 +0200
rewording ISO20022 critique
---
libeufin/iso20022.rst | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libeufin/iso20022.rst b/libeufin/iso20022.rst
index a4c0bf7..7b1fed8 100644
--- a/libeufin/iso20022.rst
+++ b/libeufin/iso20022.rst
@@ -24,13 +24,14 @@ The specifics of this mapping are:
of message elements in the same schema.
-Why does LibEuFin not use ISO 20022?
-====================================
+How does LibEuFin leverage ISO 20022?
+=====================================
-While LibEuFin can ingest ISO 20022 messages (camt.05x, pain.002) and generate
-them (pain.001), it does not use ISO 20022 in its API and internal data model.
+While LibEuFin can communicate ISO 20022 messages (camt.05x, pain.001) to
+other parties, it does **not** model its own authored API and internal data
+after the ISO 20022 standard.
-Reasons for not using ISO 20022 directly are:
+Objections to ISO20022:
1. Impedance mismatch. ISO 20022 messages do not map well to query/response
APIs.
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [taler-docs] branch master updated: rewording ISO20022 critique,
gnunet <=