[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: apache.make
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: apache.make |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:26:39 +0100 |
Nicola Pero wrote:
> > This way we would just have a single Apache module capable of loading
> > different NSBundle's containing the 'real' Apache handler. IMHO this
> > would be much better and consistent with Foundation.
>
> I am not very sure how this would cope with Apache's dynamic loading of
> Apache modules - but you probably know so I trust you it can be done. :-)
The bundle would be loaded by the GS module (and therefore by gstep-base
dynamic loading code), not by Apache itself.
> `Objective-C servlets'.
Personally I do not see a big difference between 'servlet' and 'Apache
module'. 'servlet' as a word only has a bad Java touch ;-)
I don't see why an 'ObjC-servlet' shouldn't be able to patch Apache as
deep as a native Apache module.
> My idea of the thing at this point is approximately as follows:
1,2,3 ;-)
> Helge, does this plan satisfy you ? Something important I missed ?
Sounds fine to me.
> Any other comments/suggestions ?
Well, I think it would be nice if such an 'Objective-C' servlet would
have the same API like session-less WebObjects (well, if we use a
WOSessionStore that saves to the filesystem [or some other process
independend store] we could even support sessions).
We could invent an ApacheRequestHandler which supports the whole Apache
API as the default request handler.
I think I like the idea a lot and if 1 and 2 work fine I could take a
look into that (and make the result opensource) since I would like to
rewrite the SKYRiX Apache adaptor anyway.
Does gstep-base already support the extended MacOSX-public-beta API for
key-value coding ?
Greetings
Helge
--
SKYRIX Software AG - http://www.skyrix.com
Re: apache.make, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2000/11/27
Re: apache.make, Richard Stallman, 2000/11/28