[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:16:23 +0200 (CEST) |
> GCC 3.0 has still problems with inline nested functions, but I'm not sure
> that that will be fixed (btw, official GCC 3.0 release is now scheduled in
> less than a month).
>
> Could you send a bug report to address@hidden and cc me?
There are two bug reports on GNATS about this -
PR/938:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=938&database=gcc
PR/2939
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2939&database=gcc
This second one was closed by mistake - Mark Mitchell didn't notice that
the bug PR/2924 he fixed didn't contain the inline, while this one *does*
contain the inline, so thought he had fixed this one as well. I asked him
to reopen it (I Cc:ed you in case you were interested).
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, (continued)
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/08
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/08
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m,
Nicola Pero <=