On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:10:07 -0700 Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
| Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
|
| >
| >
| > Another problem with that being that afaik FoundationExt is not
part of
| > GNUstep
| > because it's never been given to the FSF ... so we don't want to
add
| > GNUstep
| > code to it, or have GNUstep code depend on it (another reason why
I'd
| > really
| > like to have a gdl2 without such a dependency).
| >
|
| Perhaps to be more precise, we can't use it because it has the wrong
| license.
We talk about dev-lib/extensions ?
I've checked a couple of file and found the following headers:
<<
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
provided
that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both
that
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
documentation.
We disclaim all warranties with regard to this software, including
all
implied warranties of merchantability and fitness, in no event shall
we be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or
any
damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits,
whether in
an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising
out of
or in connection with the use or performance of this software.
Isn't it sufficient to include this into a LGPL'ed project ?
If not, may be we can contact authors to ask them to release file with
a good license ?
GDL use it because of garbage collection features.
Manuel
PS: I've stopped CC because I think all of us read gnustep-dev