[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding
From: |
Manuel Guesdon |
Subject: |
Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:54:27 +0100 (CET) |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:39:21 +0000 Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>
wrote:
>|
>| On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 09:08 AM, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
>| > We talk about dev-lib/extensions ?
>| > I've checked a couple of file and found the following headers:
>| > <<
>| > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
>| > documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
>| > provided
>| > that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both
>| > that
>| > copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
>| > documentation.
>| >
>| > We disclaim all warranties with regard to this software, including
>| > all
>| > implied warranties of merchantability and fitness, in no event shall
>| > we be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or
>| > any
>| > damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits,
>| > whether in
>| > an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising
>| > out of
>| > or in connection with the use or performance of this software.
>| >>>
>| >
>| > Isn't it sufficient to include this into a LGPL'ed project ?
>| >
>| > If not, may be we can contact authors to ask them to release file with
>| > a good license ?
>| >
>| > GDL use it because of garbage collection features.
>| >
>| > Manuel
>| > PS: I've stopped CC because I think all of us read gnustep-dev
>|
>| I believe the whole process was gone through fruitlessly several years
>| ago.
>| I think that gdl was not supposed to have depended on that stuff, and
>| Scott
>| (on whose behalf gdl was written) decided to re-implement gdl without the
>| extensions library dependency - but net-community ran out of money before
>| he could do it.
>|
>| It's a long time ago though, so I could well be mistaken about the
>| details
>| (especially as I've always steered clear of admin stuff like copyright,
>| and licensing etc).
>|
>| Adam might remember better, but this might well have been so long ago
>| that
>| Andrew was still running most of the admin side of things.
>|
>| Frankly, I suspect that it would be less time consuming for someone to
>| implement trivial GC classes in the gdl than to try to sort out the
>| extensions library - these admin issues tend to get pretty interminable.
It's an option but what's wrong with the current 'license'/condition of use of
extensions ?
Manuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <address@hidden>
14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement - 93200 Saint-Denis - France
Tel: +33 1 4940 0999 - Fax: +33 1 4940 0998
- Re: Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, (continued)
- Re: Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Helge Hess, 2002/02/24
- Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/24
- Re: Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Helge Hess, 2002/02/24
- Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/24
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2002/02/24
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/24
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/25
- Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding,
Manuel Guesdon <=
- Re: Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/25
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/26
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/27
Re: EOKeyValueCoding, David Wetzel, 2002/02/24