[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EOKeyValueCoding
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: EOKeyValueCoding |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:00:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020120 |
Manuel Guesdon wrote:
It's an option but what's wrong with the current 'license'/condition of use of
extensions ?
There's nothing inherently 'wrong' with the license, in fact it seems to
be GPL-compatible (as far as I can see), similar to the X11 license
(http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html).
This makes it a fairly permissive license, however. For instance, you
could take the library and add your own code and resell the library as a
proprietary produce (and not release the source code).
--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp. | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
| know how I hate the stuff.
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, (continued)
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2002/02/24
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/24
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/25
- Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding,
Adam Fedor <=
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/26
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/27
Re: EOKeyValueCoding, David Wetzel, 2002/02/24