Re: "Jaguar" additions

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 12:11 AM, Adam Atlas wrote:

> Actually, is this not a private mailing list, only for GNUstep 
> developers? I was logged in as Anonymous (on Savannah), and this 
> mailing list didn't even show up until I logged in.
>
> The only other issue is wether the other GNUstep developers would enjoy 
> having 26 pages of API documentation arrive in their mailbox.

If it's a reasonbly compact format like html, I'd be happy.

> > Well we shouldn't look at this code, particularly anyone interested in 
> > writing those classes. Particularly since it's an open standard, we 
> > could have the ability to drive it's adoption on GNU/Linux and other 
> > Free OSs. That would be cool.
>
> True, since it's an open standard, I guess it's not really necessary to 
> look at existing source code. There's even a draft RFC at 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-zeroconf-reqts-10.txt . 
> (There are more documents and information at www.zeroconf.org.)

The license on the code may be incompatible with LGPL, so if we took the 
knowledge
from looking at that source and built it into GNUstep we could get in 
trouble with
Apple insisting that we release GNUstep under their license.