[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Public methods description should be in header files

From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: Public methods description should be in header files
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:51:58 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020610

Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:

On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 03:46  pm, Nicola Pero wrote:

I want to keep documentation primarily in source (but allowing headers) because it's easier for me to write it there and I think that's true for others too, but I would be quite happy to write stuff in the source and have you write stuff in
the headers ... makes no difference to me (or to autogsdoc generated

Ok - shall we then agree on this as a reasonable agreement ?

It would be nice to have all API documentation in a single place, but we
have not reached an agreement on where (headers vs source) to put it ...
at least not yet - so I'd say for now it's a reasonable agreement.

Yes ... I'm very happy to just have people put it in header/source as they like.

That's fine. I'll keep the documentation where I found it from now on.

Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]