Re: Public methods description should be in header files

[Adam Fedor]

Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 03:46  pm, Nicola Pero wrote:
>
> > > > > I want to keep documentation primarily in source (but allowing 
> > > > > headers) because
> > > > > it's easier for me to write it there and I think that's true for 
> > > > > others too, but
> > > > > I would be quite happy to write stuff in the source and have you 
> > > > > write stuff in
> > > > > the headers ... makes no difference to me (or to autogsdoc generated
> > > > > documentation).
> >
> > Ok - shall we then agree on this as a reasonable agreement ?
> >
> > It would be nice to have all API documentation in a single place, but we
> > have not reached an agreement on where (headers vs source) to put it ...
> > at least not yet - so I'd say for now it's a reasonable agreement.
>
>
> Yes ... I'm very happy to just have people put it in header/source as 
> they like.

That's fine. I'll keep the documentation where I found it from now on.

--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.