|
From: | David Ayers |
Subject: | Re: RFC: GDL2 differences to EOF / WO4.5.1 |
Date: | Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:43:25 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 |
Giulio Cesare Solaroli wrote:
On Wednesday, Mar 26, 2003, at 22:53 Europe/Rome, Stéphane Corthésy wrote:Yes, this is absolutly correct. Right now the test cases merely cover single classes and thier API and currently only include some EOControl classes (Well also some adaptor and EOModel tests, but they need to be revisited). Also a lot of the tests are currently still "out of context". This should change over time, but for a more exhaustive testing, additional testing frameworks such as yours can only help us.GDL2 won't have enough test cases, despite David's efforts, so if we can get some more tests using OCUnit, that would benefit all.
If I remember correctly, the only issue with OCUnit based code is that, despite of that fact that it is based on free (as in speech) software, it is not a GNU package, and that was why base our testing on guile eventhough it is sometimes rather akward to handle.
I think it would be great if you would contribute your extensions to the FSF and you could maintain it in the GNUstep repository though (if I interpreted you correctly).
Cheers, Dave
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |