Re: RFC Distributed Object behavior for pointers

[Alexander Malmberg]

Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> How should GNUstep do it?
> Do we want to make the calling code check to see if it is calling a
> method via DO, and free the memory explicity, or do we want to use
> autoreleased memory for consistency with the way objects are returned,
> and have the caller copy the contents of the memory if it wants to keep
> it?
> The second form seems better to me, but I don't know what OPENSTEP does.

Autoreleasing seems to be the best approach to me. Keeping the objects
around 

- Alexander Malmberg