[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC Distributed Object behavior for pointers

From: Alexander Malmberg
Subject: Re: RFC Distributed Object behavior for pointers
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:18:37 +0200

Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> How should GNUstep do it?
> Do we want to make the calling code check to see if it is calling a
> method via DO, and free the memory explicity, or do we want to use
> autoreleased memory for consistency with the way objects are returned,
> and have the caller copy the contents of the memory if it wants to keep
> it?
> The second form seems better to me, but I don't know what OPENSTEP does.

Autoreleasing seems to be the best approach to me. Keeping the objects

- Alexander Malmberg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]