[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:15:51 +0100 (BST) |
> >> I'd like to propose to make autogsdoc a separate package from
> >> gnustep-base.
> >> It has nothing to do with gnustep-base actually, as it's a completely
> >> independent documentation tool.
> >
> > Yes, but it's hard enough to get people to write/read the
> > documentation as it is. Requiring a separate package would make it
> > harder (plus I'd have to maintain a separate package as well
> > (relases,etc)).
>
> I see no problem (other than the maintainability overhead ... a pretty strong
> argument)
> with moving autogsdoc and dwrite and make_strings and cvtenc etc etc out into
> a
> separate package, but no point either.
make_strings is probably part of gnustep-base; autogsdoc is definitely
not.
Compare that with OPENSTEP: the equivalent of make_strings was shipped by
default; the equivalent of autogsdoc was not.
- Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/21
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Adam Fedor, 2003/07/21
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Adam Fedor, 2003/07/22
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Helge Hess, 2003/07/22