|
From: | Helge Hess |
Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?) |
Date: | Mon, 2 Feb 2004 02:23:02 +0100 |
On 30.01.2004, at 20:08, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
I think that if (MyPtr) is more readable than if (MyPtr == NULL)because it's shorter and still easily understandable buts it's only my opinion :-)
Wow, what an excellent example! :-) Manuel already did a mistake when trying to rewrite the expression, of course
if (MyPtr) would translate to if (MyPtr != NULL) and NOT to if (MyPtr == NULL)QED: that's nonsense and leads to unncessary errors. ;-) Every C developer knows what "if (ptr)" does.
Hm, well, actually I do prefer "if (ptr == NULL)" over "if (!ptr)". Not sure why.
Greets Helge -- http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge OpenGroupware.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |