Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?)

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 5 Feb 2004, at 23:13, Adam Fedor wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Ayers
> > One question Alex brought up on #GNUstep is the visibility of
> > isYES().
> > On the one hand I beleive it should be public and used through
> > GNUstep+Libs+Apps.  OTOH it may interefer with third party
> > code.  If we
> > want to make it internal to each package, it would be OK with me.
>
> If we plan on using it thoughout GNUstep, we should probably make it 
> public (as an extension) and probably document it also - people tend 
> to use the stuff they see in the GNUstep source in their own code. I 
> don't think there will be an issue with conflicting macros.

Yes, I agree with that sort of thing being public.