[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work (Was: Re: why do we need change?)

From: Dennis Leeuw
Subject: Re: Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work (Was: Re: why do we need change?)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:49:52 +0200
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050817)

Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Alright, let's stop arguing (which doesn't lead anywhere) and starting holes in
the air, but let's instead start some heavy-weight brain-storming for ideas on
how to implement the problems at hand. From the dicussions before we already
know that:

 - GNUstep needs somewhat tighter management of it's further development

 - GNUstep needs to better react to proposals coming from it's users (meaning
"people using GNUstep", not just end-users)

My proposal for the first point is setting up some sort of "GNUstep Steering
Commitee" composed of a bunch of people which would choose the direction.
Perhaps 3, 4, or 5 people, the precise number doesn't matter. It should be
core-developers, people who have authority, knowledge and wisdom.

As for the second point, I propose setting up a discussion forum (something like
a phpBB or something simmilar) entitled like "GNUstep Future". In the forum
there could be sections like:

Could we for now, just make it a little easier (Although I like your idea). Could we first define and set (e.g. in the wiki or on the progress page). The things we think needs to be done to get GUI and Back to 1.0?

I think it is a clear goal. Something we can all agree on, I don't think there isn't anybody who doesn't want GNUstep to become 1.0. We just need a list of things to be done and a timeframe.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]