[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work)
From: |
Fabien VALLON |
Subject: |
RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:30:33 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.5 |
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 19:50, Adam Fedor wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fabien VALLON > * Check if all OpenStep methods/classes are
>> implemented and if not,
>> implement them or add it in documentation
>> ( ex: in
>> http://gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Gui/Gener
> al/OpenStepCompliance.html
> Nothing about NSBTreeBlock and some others ( removed because they are no
> longer part of OpenStep standard ) )
>
> See also
>
> http://gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Base/General/OpenStepCompliance.html
True.
I think it should be fix here :
http://gnustep.org/developers/documentation.html
(OpenStep and OS X Compliance)
Fabien
- Re: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work), (continued)
RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work), Fabien VALLON, 2005/10/26
RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work), Fabien VALLON, 2005/10/27
RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work), Adam Fedor, 2005/10/26
- RE: The goal of GNUstep 1.0 (Why Unanimous Consent Doesn't Work),
Fabien VALLON <=