Re: Repository change to SVN, Jan 28th

[Riccardo]

Hello,

On Saturday, January 21, 2006, at 03:47 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:

> I am a bit puzzled by this fast transission over to SVN. Looks like
> everybody wants to take place, or at least does not oppose it. Still we
> should make sure that now that we doing it, it does not interrupt the
> GNUstep development to much. For this I would like to see a transission
> periode, where the offical GNUstep code is still in CVS, but there is
> the same code in SVN to play with. Every GNUstep developer should do a
> few test updates during that time and we do the actual move, when we all
> feel comfortable with SVN. (I know I should have been practising myself
> already, but I didn't)

Untrue! I would prefer keeping CVS and don't bother about CVS. However I 
find such a transition period dangerous and difficult to manage, so a 
"instantaneous" switch is the best thing imho. A CVS mirror out of the 
SVN should be created at the same time so anonymous check-out can 
continue "as usual".

Have fun,

  R