gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: remote hosting


From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: remote hosting
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:45:44 -0700

Yes these seems like a good change.

On Jan 30, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:

Hi Tim,

thank you for this long explaination. You did convince me, I am now all
in favour for your patch. Your patch seems to make scenarios possible,
that didn't work before. But this is not my area of expertice, perhaps
Adam and Richard have something to say here?

Fred


Tim McIntosh wrote:

Sorry for the confusion.  The specific case that I want to work is as
follows:  I have a machine running GNUstep (call it 'localhost').  I
log into this machine from another non-GNUstep machine (call it
'remotehost') using 'Xnest' (display ":1") to connect to the xdm on
'localhost'.  Thus, DISPLAY is 'remotehost:1.0' and the GNUstep
processes are running on 'localhost'.

This "sort of" works without the patch. The initial processes that are
launched _without_ the '-NSHost' argument will correctly display  on
'remotehost:1.0', while printing the warning "NOTE: Only one  display
per host fully supported."  However, the 'NSHost' default  will be
(incorrectly) set to 'remotehost' by the code I've proposed  deleting.
As I understand it, this default causes the programs to  look for
'gdnc', 'gpbs', etc. on 'remotehost', instead of  'localhost', where
they are actually running.

The problem gets worse when one of those initial processes (e.g.
GWorkspace) launches another GNUstep application via the NSWorkspace
methods.  Since the parent process has the 'NSHost' default set, the
new process will be launched with the '-NSHost' argument (see
NSWorkspace.m).  When the -NSHost argument is specified, the code in
the patched method (_initXContext) ignores the DISPLAY settings. Thus,
the launched applications will use 'remotehost:0.0' for the  display.
This leads to some surprising results when 'remotehost:0.0' is a valid
display.

From looking at the code, I think you would also see a similar problem
if you attempted to use display ":1" (or any nonzero display)  on
'localhost', though I haven't tried this.

I think it makes sense for the '-NSHost' argument to override the
DISPLAY setting, as it does today.  I think the problem is the
assumption that the 'NSHost' default should be set according to DISPLAY
if -NSHost was not explicitly specified.  As I see it, the '- NSHost'
argument says that I want to connect to a remote GNUstep session. If I
don't specify -NSHost, I'm saying I want to run  GNUstep on the local
host and display according to the DISPLAY setting.

I realize that this is slightly less convenient in the case where you
want to use a remote GNUstep session on 'remotehost:0.0' and would like
to rely on the DISPLAY setting, but I'd rather have more control  over
the display. Having to specify the -NSHost argument seems reasonable, especially considering that you had to do this under OPENSTEP and you'd
have to do it anyway if you weren't using X11.



_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]