[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results
From: |
Andrew Ruder |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:41:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:02:01PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
> I narrowed it down to one method, but that doesn't really help much.
> On the solaris, I'm still using the 2.95 compiler, mostly to check for
> backward compatibility. Perhaps I should just upgrade and start
> deprecating support for gcc 2.95?
The way I see it, gcc 3.0 was released on June 18, 2001. This is more
than 5 years ago. In the technology world, that is a very long, long
time. If there's really platforms that don't have gcc 3 or higher,
maybe it is just time for those platforms to be depracated (or they can
use an older version of gnustep).
Just my two cents,
Andy
--
Andrew Ruder <address@hidden>
http://www.aeruder.net
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Adam Fedor, 2006/08/10
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results,
Andrew Ruder <=
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/08/11
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/08/11
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Fred Kiefer, 2006/08/11
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Helge Hess, 2006/08/11
- GCC 2.95.x deprecation (was Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results), Gregory John Casamento, 2006/08/12
- Re: GCC 2.95.x deprecation (was Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results), Riccardo, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Riccardo, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Adam Fedor, 2006/08/13
- GCC 2.95 deprecation (Was Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results), Gregory John Casamento, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results, Adam Fedor, 2006/08/13