Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results

[Riccardo]

Hello,

On Friday, August 11, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:

> I am not that sure about this. gcc 2.95 is a very old version, but it
> still has its own merits. It was the most popular release before the
> re-architecture and in many cases it is still faster than the later gcc
> releases. It also is in some cases the only version of gcc at hand. (I
> had to learn this when trying to do cross compilation of GNUstep)

I agree here. Sensing the hint of Gregory I would go as far as 
considering 2.95 bugs non-critical, but trying not to actively break 
2.95 and officially supporting it in the core stuff I mentioned in the 
previous email.


Cheers,
  R