Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results

[Adam Fedor]

On 2006-08-13 02:29:04 -0600 Riccardo <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Friday, August 11, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> > I am not that sure about this. gcc 2.95 is a very old version, but it
> > still has its own merits. It was the most popular release before the
> > re-architecture and in many cases it is still faster than the later 
> > gcc
> > releases. It also is in some cases the only version of gcc at hand. 
> > (I
> > had to learn this when trying to do cross compilation of GNUstep)
>
> I agree here. Sensing the hint of Gregory I would go as far as 
> considering 
> 2.95 bugs non-critical, but trying not to actively break 2.95 and 
> officially 
> supporting it in the core stuff I mentioned in the previous email.

I think that is our plan. We'll try to fix anything we can, but not 
delay a release if something is broken on 2.95.