Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results

[Adam Fedor]

On 2006-08-11 04:27:51 -0600 Fred Kiefer <address@hidden> wrote:
> I agree with all of you that we should not waste to much effort on
> getting it working, but in this specific case, we have just one method
> that is failing and we know that up to a certain date this wasn't the
> case. Perhaps it is not too hard to sort out this method?
> Adam, which one is this method? And are you willing to test different
> implementations? BTW which version of gcc 2.95 is installed, 2.95.2 or
> 2.95.3?

GSString.m compiles if I take out these methods (in two different 
classes)

- (NSString*) substringFromRange: (NSRange)aRange
{
  GS_RANGE_CHECK(aRange, _count);
  return substring_c((GSStr)self, aRange);
}

- (NSString*) substringWithRange: (NSRange)aRange
{
  GS_RANGE_CHECK(aRange, _count);
  return substring_c((GSStr)self, aRange);
}

======
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)


I haven't really looked into when it changed.