----- Original Message ----
From: Riccardo <address@hidden>
To: Fred Kiefer <address@hidden>
Cc: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 4:29:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results
Hello,
On Friday, August 11, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> I am not that sure about this. gcc 2.95 is a very old version, but it
> still has its own merits. It was the most popular release before the
> re-architecture and in many cases it is still faster than the later gcc
> releases. It also is in some cases the only version of gcc at hand. (I
> had to learn this when trying to do cross compilation of GNUstep)
I agree here. Sensing the hint of Gregory I would go as far as
considering 2.95 bugs
non-critical, but trying not to actively break
2.95 and officially supporting it in the core stuff I mentioned in the
previous email.
Cheers,
R
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev