|
| From: | Helge Hess |
| Subject: | Re: Advertisement for gnustep |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:41:50 +0200 |
On Sep 13, 2006, at 24:19, Yavor Doganov wrote:
And as a surplus we also would get some more apps for GNUstep (even if some of those would be commercial ones).Free commercial apps are welcome, but not proprietary ones.
Obviously this is non-sense. If proprietary apps wouldn't be welcome, GNUstep would be GPL, not LGPL. GNUstep is LGPL to explicitly allow for that.
It will be a contribution equal to zero (even a negative number) if someone ports a non-free app for GNUstep.
Again utter non-sense. Its quite an excellent contribution for plenty of reasons (not only the app itself, but also in the related framework improvements) until it gets possibly replaced by a free application.
Helge -- Helge Hess http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |