Re: Advertisement for gnustep

[Yavor Doganov]

Helge Hess wrote:
> > Free commercial apps are welcome, but not proprietary ones.
>
> Obviously this is non-sense. If proprietary apps wouldn't be welcome, 
>  GNUstep would be
> GPL, not LGPL. GNUstep is LGPL to explicitly allow  for that.

Let me rephrase it: the fact that the core GNU libraries are under 
LGPL does not mean that Opera, Skype and the NVidious drivers are 
contributions to the free software community that have to be welcomed. 
 The strategy behind the LGPL is not to improve and expand the 
electronic colonization.  You are free to develop such apps, just 
don't confuse the free people that they are a "contribution".  We 
reject non-free software due to its unethical and antisocial nature 
and refuse to use it.