Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa.

[Gregory John Casamento]

It would be really nice to do some concrete tests to get some real numbers on 
this.   It would definitely be something to put up on the website.

Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento

----- Original Message ----
From: Helge Hess <address@hidden>
To: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 2:24:39 PM
Subject: Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa.

On Oct 3, 2006, at 18:17, Daniel J Farrell wrote:
> Now, not a true test by any means just a tentative suggestion from  
> a large command line app. The app is basically a scientific number  
> cruncher. I have run the same code, on the same computer, one  
> compiled in xcode linking to Cocoa Foundation and the other  
> compiled using gcc make, make install, openapp etc. linked to  
> GNUstep Base. The GNUstep version is 50% faster (47.8% increase to  
> be more precise).

Does GNUstep-base work with the Apple runtime or do you use the GNU  
Objective-C runtime?

If you want to further optimize the issue you should have a look in  
Shark. By comparing the output of the Cocoa with GNUstep binary you  
should also be able to tell why GNUstep performs better in your  
specific case.

Thanks,
   Helge
-- 
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/




_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev