Re: gnustep release numbers

[Gregory John Casamento]

Since, you're the one making this assertion, I believe it's up to you to prove 
that we have broken it in every release.

I don't have the same impression.

GJC
--
Gregory Casamento

----- Original Message ----
From: Helge Hess <address@hidden>
To: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 12:26:39 PM
Subject: Re: gnustep release numbers

On Oct 4, 2006, at 13:46, David Ayers wrote:
> IIRC we have a long
> discussion in the archive about not bumping SO numbers unless we know
> binary compatibility was broken.

Did we have a single gstep-base release which did NOT break the ABI?  
I don't think so.
As mentioned in that long discussion ;-) I'm in favor of doing an  
occasional ABI stable release and have frequent ABI unstable ones  
properly tagged as such. The latter then do not need to preserve ABI  
stability for sonames.

Greets,
   Helge
-- 
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/




_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev