[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnustep-make experiment
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: gnustep-make experiment |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:16:28 +0100 (CET) |
>> Did you add your System Libraries directory and your Local Libraries
>> directory to /etc/ld.so.conf ? Did you run ldconfig after installing
>> any new library ? If not, it won't work.
>
> That's the same for lots of non-gnustep stuff too, but mostly non-
> gnustep stuff seems to avoid the problem.
> I suspect that many packages have their installation scripts run
> ldconfig for you.
> Perhaps gnustep-make could be enhanced to do that on systems where
> /etc/ld.so.conf and ldconfig are available?
Yes, it sounds like an excellent idea to do it automatically. :-)
Main questions for discussion are --
* How we decide if we have to run ldconfig or not ? Do we need to run it only
on GNU/Linux ? Are there similar tools on other unixes ? (I imagine so, so
we'll have a general-purpose post-library-install target-dependent command that
we run automatically)
* Should we try running ldconfig only if LD_LIBRARY_PATH does not include the
GNUstep libraries directories ? Or do we run it always ?
* How would you disable running ldconfig automatically ? Do we add a command
line flag ? Like 'make ldconfig=no' ?
Thanks
- Re: gnustep-make experiment, (continued)
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/11
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/11
Re: gnustep-make experiment,
Nicola Pero <=
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/12
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/12
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/12
Re: gnustep-make experiment, Nicola Pero, 2007/02/12