Re: gnustep-make experiment

[Matt Rice]

On 2007-02-16 12:04:14 -0800 Nicola Pero 
<address@hidden> wrote:

> This patch rewrites some internal code (making it more complex, not 
> more easy,
> but I suppose it's a matter of taste) and the only visible effect I 
> can see 
> is that it destroys the non-flattened (ie, fat binary) support in 
> gnustep-make. :-(
>
> Fat binaries *will* be/are supported in gnustep-make v2, and given 
> all the 
> effort that was
> spent to keep that very difficult feature working across massive 
> changes in 
> going from
> gnustep-make v1 to gnustep-make v2, I do want it to be clearly 
> advertised and 
> marketed. :-)
>
> No way we're dropping it right now once all the work has been 
> completed and 
> we're on track
> with gnustep-make v2.

No that should still work..

GNUSTEP_HEADERS_DIRS/GNUSTEP_HEADERS_FLAGS and the libraries 
counterparts

is either set to ${GNUSTEP_HEADERS_DIRS_FLATTENED} or
${GNUSTEP_HEADERS_DIRS_NON_FLATTENED}

this stuff just no longer needs to be handled inside of make.