gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results


From: Yong-Jhen Hong
Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:45:15 +0800
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Hi GNUstep developers,

David Ayers wrote:
> Adam Fedor schrieb:
>> Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec  3 06:34:10 EST 2007
>> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
>> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
>>
>> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
>> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F
>>
>> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec  3 15:36:40 CST 2007
>
> NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber initWithBytes:objCType:]':
> NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff'
> ...
> ../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff'
> gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1
> gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools'
> gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2
>
>
> Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to
> define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible,
> or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff?

On my FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 box, isinf() is a macro that supports both
double and float (so does isnan()), and visible from <math.h>,
but there is no isinff().

I think it conforms to the ISO C standard according to this:

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/isinf.html

I am not sure about isinff().

Regards,
Yong-jhen.

>
>
>> Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec  3 03:57:12 CET 2007
>> Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec  3 01:23:28 EST 2007
>
> Here it seems that
>
> isnanf
> isinf
> isinff
>
> are all not visible. There must also be someway to expose the C99 macros.
>
> Cheers,
> David





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]