Re: bindings and Renaissance

[Gregory John Casamento]

One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes for 
Binding.   They have to be finished.   Are you going to be using these in 
Renaissance?   Do you currently use the existing connector classes?

Mostly curious. :)

GJC
 
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc 
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer

----- Original Message ----
From: Xavier Glattard <address@hidden>
To: Nicola Pero <address@hidden>
Cc: Xavier Glattard <address@hidden>; Fred Kiefer <address@hidden>; 
address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:08:24 AM
Subject: Re: bindings and Renaissance

Selon Nicola Pero <address@hidden>:

> >> In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
> >> field to the
> >> 2nd one :
> >>   [first bind:"value" toObject:second ...]
> >> If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
> >> But I expected
> >> that the value of the 1st would be updated when the value of the
> >> 2nd one
> >> changes. To get that behavior i have to bind the 2nd field to the
> >> first.
> >>   [second bind:"value" toObject:first ...]
> >>
> >
> > I think that is the expected behaviour. At least it was what I
> > implemented :-)
>
> Yes, on Apple Mac OS X it seems to work in the same way. :-)

I'm quite suprised that an Apple made class is not KVC compliant.
But i may have miss something.

Thank you for the test :-)

Xavier


_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev