Re: bindings and Renaissance

[Gregory John Casamento]

Aren't you effectively writing code when you create the XML by hand?
 
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc 
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer

----- Original Message ----
From: Xavier Glattard <address@hidden>
To: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>
Cc: Xavier Glattard <address@hidden>; Nicola Pero <address@hidden>; Fred Kiefer 
<address@hidden>; address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 6:28:52 PM
Subject: Re: bindings and Renaissance

Selon Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>:

> One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes for
> Binding.   They have to be finished.   Are you going to be using these in
> Renaissance?   Do you currently use the existing connector classes?
>
> Mostly curious. :)
>
> GJC
>
> Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
> # GNUstep Chief Maintainer

I don't currently use any other connector, i'm new to Renaissance, but i'll work
on it.

Well... i'm lazy
Renaissance is a tool to build a gui without code.
Bindings are tools to bind a gui to a model without code.
I'm looking to Core Data that is a tool to build model without code.

So : yes i would like to use Bindings in Renaissance.

I would like to get a full RAD environment with GNUstep that allows to build an
application without... you know what. Only XML.

And if i really need some code i might use steptalk.

Xavier,
  lazy dreamer ^_^