[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows look and feel
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: Windows look and feel |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:22:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112) |
Philippe Bernery wrote:
> Fred, what would be different between a windows-ish interface and a
> real windows interface?
I would draw the difference at the point where all the control elements
get displayed with naive Windows function calls. Many Windows
applications do that themselves and they look out of style. This is also
the case with GNUstep applications on Windows no. When using native
drawing code, we could improve on that, but there surely will be places
where the available Windows controls don't fit our needs.
Still, even with native colours, native control drawing, menus inside
the window and what ever other adoption will be possible, I would
expect that it will always be possible to tell a ported GNUstep
application from one that was developed for Windows.
- Windows look and feel, Philippe Bernery, 2008/12/22
- Re: Windows look and feel, TMC, 2008/12/25
- Re: Windows look and feel, Fred Kiefer, 2008/12/26
- Re: Windows look and feel, Philippe Bernery, 2008/12/29
- Re: Windows look and feel,
Fred Kiefer <=
- Re: Windows look and feel, Gregory John Casamento, 2008/12/29
- Re: Windows look and feel, Philippe Bernery, 2008/12/29
- Re: Windows look and feel, Gregory John Casamento, 2008/12/30
- Re: Windows look and feel, Fred Kiefer, 2008/12/30
- Re: Windows look and feel, Philippe Bernery, 2008/12/31