[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code
|
From: |
David Chisnall |
|
Subject: |
Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:33:52 +0000 |
On 18 Feb 2010, at 09:09, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> base/NSNumber/basic.m:
> FAIL: Object 0 of class 'NSNumber' is retained by copy with other zone
This one is mine, but I'm not certain that the behaviour it is expecting is
correct. Shouldn't copyWithZone: in a different zone always result in a real
copy? Not doing this makes zones somewhat useless.
David
-- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA
- Compiler warnings with the new base code, Fred Kiefer, 2010/02/15
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/02/15
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Fred Kiefer, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Fred Kiefer, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, David Chisnall, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, David Chisnall, 2010/02/18
- Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/02/18
Re: Compiler warnings with the new base code, icicle, 2010/02/16