[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs)
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs) |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:58:49 +0100 |
On 12 Sep 2010, at 17:46, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> Is there some way to mark things so that all the cases where the analyser is
> known to be wrong (or is reporting something correctly, but the 'problem' is
> actually intended behavior) will no longer be reported?
> It looks like there are so many false positives that it's hard to use this
> report.
There are some annotations that you can use. If you can give me a specific
example, I can probably suggest something...
David
-- Sent from my PDP-11
- Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/09
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/09
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), Fred Kiefer, 2010/09/10
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/10
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/11
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/11
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/09/12
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs),
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/13
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), Fred Kiefer, 2010/09/13
- Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs), David Chisnall, 2010/09/13