[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI)
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:26:11 +0100 (CET) |
> The only issue is with headers that are
> removed from the source tree without updating Foundation.h, since the
> old header still may be present in the installed location (I don't
> know whether gnustep-make prunes the header directories upon make
> install. Nicola?)
No, it doesn't prune existing headers from the header directories.
That is an interesting idea though. Hmmm.
Thanks
- Re: Problem with GUI, (continued)
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Tim Kack, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Tim Kack, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Wolfgang Lux, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Wolfgang Lux, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI),
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Fred Kiefer, 2010/11/24
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Nicola Pero, 2010/11/23