[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI)
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:52:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.0.10 Thunderbird/3.0.10 |
Am 23.11.2010 15:17, schrieb Wolfgang Lux:
> David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 23 Nov 2010, at 13:09, Tim Kack wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Btw, Foundation.h.install needs to be reverted as well since it is
>>> importing non existing NSCalender.h.
>>
>> Should be fixed.
>
> which reminds me of the question I was going to ask for quite some time:
> What is the point of having two different headers in the first place?
> The headers are (almost) identical, so this split apparently just ends
> up in being a maintenance nightmare.
Good question! Even after David's revert there are still differences
between these files. Are these on purpose or is this a bug? The best way
to ensure that they are identical is to just have one file or to
generate one from the other when it changes.
Fred
- Re: Problem with GUI, (continued)
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Tim Kack, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Tim Kack, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Wolfgang Lux, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Wolfgang Lux, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI), Nicola Pero, 2010/11/23
- Re: Foundation.h vs. Foundation.h.install (Was: Problem with GUI),
Fred Kiefer <=
- Re: Problem with GUI, David Chisnall, 2010/11/23
- Re: Problem with GUI, Nicola Pero, 2010/11/23