gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving the bug system to GNA....


From: Banlu Kemiyatorn
Subject: Re: Moving the bug system to GNA....
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:28:35 +0700

I like the idea but I doubt it would make users life easier. For instance, a user found a bug and google for it and will end up with mixed of two site, asking themselves which one to use. The search for existing bugs by site interface could also be dupped efforts. Nonetheless, I support the move. Why? Because making life a bit harder and not too much could be productive. Spending more time searching and reading could help improving the quality of the reports, dont't get lazy!


--
Sent from my GNU/Linux N900

----- Original message -----
> David just corrected me... savannah is FSF, gna is FSF-E.  I don't
> care about organizational stuff... I just care about making things
> easier for users.
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Gregory Casamento
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Riccardo,
> >
> > GNA is a GNU/FSF server just the same as savannah...  there's nothing
> > special about savannah at all.   The disadvantage to moving the
> > sources back is that people would have to alter their SVN repositories
> > to point to Savannah and it would be disruptive.
> >
> > Simply moving bug tracking to GNA would reduce confusion as to where
> > the project is located.  I would like to get rid of the project on
> > savannah because it causes some amount of confusion when people go
> > looking for GNUstep.
> >
> > GC
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Riccardo Mottola
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't think it is a good idea, we are a gnu idea. I never liked
> > > our move to GNA and if the division irritates you, we should move
> > > the sources back home. It was done back then because GNA had svn
> > > support before gnu savannah...
> > >
> > > my 2 cents,
> > > R
> > >
> > > On 05/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey guys,
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment.  It
> > > > seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
> > > > other.
> > > >
> > > > The move would simply be to keep the old system active for all
> > > > currently open bugs and to open only new bugs on the new system.
> > > > This would allow a transition to the new system, albeit a slow one.
> > > >
> > > > GC
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gnustep-dev mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc.
> > yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
> > (240)274-9630 (Cell)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc.
> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]