Hi,
good, I have 3.4.5 on mingw.
With your fix, everything compiles. However running base checks has a
lot of failed tests:
base/NSCalendarDate/test00.m:
Failed test: test00.m:107 ...
+dateWithString:calendarFormat:locale: handles
Africa/Addis_Ababa
Failed test: test00.m:246 ... date check with 2002-03-31 01:30:00
Failed test: test00.m:261 ... date check with 2002-03-31 01:30:00
Failed test: test00.m:265 ... date check with 2002-03-31 00:30:00
Failed test: test00.m:410 ... date year calculation preserves
timezone
---base/NSMutableString/NSMutableString_string.m:
Failed test: ../NSString/NSString_tests.h:309 ... character set
encoding/dec
oding works
--- Running tests in base/NSNumber ---
base/NSNumber/test00.m:
Failed test: test00.m:102 ... NSDecimalNumber numberWithInt: works
Failed test: test00.m:107 ... NSDecimalNumber doubleValue works
Failed test: test00.m:111 ... NSDecimalNumber charValue works
Failed test: test00.m:113 ... NSDecimalNumber intValue works
Failed test: test00.m:115 ... NSDecimalNumber integerValue works
Failed test: test00.m:117 ... NSDecimalNumber longValue works
Failed test: test00.m:119 ... NSDecimalNumber longLongValue works
Failed test: test00.m:121 ... NSDecimalNumber shortValue works
Failed test: test00.m:123 ... NSDecimalNumber unsignedCharValue works
Failed test: test00.m:125 ... NSDecimalNumber unsignedIntValue works
Failed test: test00.m:127 ... NSDecimalNumber unsignedIntegerValue
works
Failed test: test00.m:129 ... NSDecimalNumber unsignedLongValue works
Failed test: test00.m:133 ... NSDecimalNumber unsignedShortValue
works
and then the last one:
base/NSObject/initialize.m:
Failed build:
--- Running tests in base/NSOperation ---
Here test runs just hang, with 0% cpu usage
I interrupted tests. I will compile gui and back and see how "usage"
fares.
Fred Kiefer wrote:
This problem is due to old versions of gcc (< 4.0) not supporting the
build in __builtin_offsetof. I just committed a workaround that
defines this as a macro. This code is based on a suggestion by David
Chisnall and I could not test it myself as I don't have a gcc that
old. Please give it a try and don't forget to test with gcc 2.95 as
well.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev