[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next GNUstep release?
From: |
Eric Wasylishen |
Subject: |
Re: Next GNUstep release? |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:05:07 -0700 |
Hi Fred,
I agree we should do a gui release as soon as possible - if I tested correctly,
the latest gui release 0.20.0 doesn't work the the latest base, 1.23.0. I would
like to get the changes you suggest in (font rewrite and filter services), but
on the other hand, I think doing a release soon is more important - the font
rewrite could be quite a lot of work - and we can simply remove the
ImageMagick and Ghostscript image reps for now.
As for the new cairo backend I added to back, we can either release with it or
not. The resize flickering is definitely worse, but it supports some 16-bit
configurations that were previously unsupported, and performs better over SSH.
btw, I have an experimental branch of back at
svn+ssh://address@hidden/svn/gnustep/libs/back/branches/ericwa-experimental ,
which only supports x11 and cairo with the new surface. The goal is to try to
clean up XGServerWindow/Event, and get rid of all legacy or "magic" code. So
far I deleted a lot of code from XGServerWindow, deleted XWindowBuffer, and got
rid of styleoffset support. One of the changes I made (I think in
XGServerWindow ) got rid of the resize flickering, the only problem is, I'm not
sure exactly what the change was. Anyway, it's encouraging, at least.
Cheers
Eric
On 2011-11-08, at 3:49 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> For over a month I have been suggesting a new release of all GNUstep code
> components (perhaps including Gorm as well), but got no reply at all. Many of
> us have been pretty busy fixing the bugs Julian reported and there is still
> plenty to do in this area. Anyway I would like to start a discussion about
> this subject.
>
> After the last base release we did not make a gui/back release although some
> of the changes in base wont work with an old version of gui. This means
> anybody wanting to use GNUstep with a graphical user interface either has to
> use a very old release of all components or use SVN. The later is especially
> bad for distributions as they will have to ship an unclear state of the code.
>
> I will be away the first two weeks of December and would either like to see a
> release before that or after, but wont be available for last minute bug fixes
> during that period.
> There are a few changes to gui/back which I would like to see done before the
> release. One is the conversion of the Ghostscript and the ImageMagick bitmap
> implementations into filter services. The other is the integration of the
> real cairo font interface (instead of the currently used toy fonts) as
> prototyped in Opal. Is there anything important I did forget?
>
> It would be great if everybody could start to test its favourite application
> to find out whether any of the recent changes introduced new issues. What are
> the plans for GNUstep make and base? I think there have been enough changes
> in base that warrant a new release and gui requires some of these changes.
> For make there are a few open bug reports, maybe some of them could be fixed
> for the release?
>
> Please remember that this will be the first GNUstep release that requires gcc
> >= 4.0. We decided so at the last base release and gui requires a current
> base version.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, (continued)
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, David Chisnall, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, David Chisnall, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Ivan Vučica, 2011/11/10
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Fred Kiefer, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/11/09
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/11/10
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Pirmin Braun, 2011/11/10
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/11/09
Re: Next GNUstep release?,
Eric Wasylishen <=