[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so g
From: |
Matt Rice |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:43:14 -0800 |
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:26 PM, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:
> There is no such thing as gcc ld. There are two GNU linkers, gold and bfd ld.
I believe that the bfd linker also uses the same plugin API and now
supports lto, haven't tried it myself though.
- Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/03
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, David Chisnall, 2012/01/03
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/04
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/01/04
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, David Chisnall, 2012/01/04
- =?utf-8?q?Re:_Multiple_=5FOBJC=5FModule_in_the_same_shared_library/framework, =09not_so_good?=, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/01/04
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/04
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, David Chisnall, 2012/01/04
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good,
Matt Rice <=
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/07
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, David Chisnall, 2012/01/07
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/07
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/01/08
- Re: Multiple _OBJC_Module in the same shared library/framework, not so good, Nat!, 2012/01/09