[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Question |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:44:58 +0000 |
On 6 Mar 2013, at 13:24, Laurent Michel <address@hidden> wrote:
> I went in gdb and checked. The error is raised from a call in my own code.
> The receiver has the proper type and the method does exist.
> The way the code is organized mimics the frameworks I have on MacOS (5 of
> them).
>
> Here is the backtrace.
>
> #18 0xb7d02f8d in -[NSObject doesNotRecognizeSelector:] (self=0x80f98e4,
> _cmd=0xb7f71ea8, aSelector=<optimized out>) at NSObject.m:1739
> #19 0xb7d03051 in -[NSObject forwardInvocation:] (self=<optimized out>,
> _cmd=0xb7f9c818, anInvocation=0x80f98e4) at NSObject.m:1753
> #20 0xb7db6af7 in GSFFIInvocationCallback (cif=<optimized out>,
> retp=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>, user=<optimized out>)
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> at GSFFIInvocation.m:629
> #21 0xb6f85176 in ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6
> #22 0xb6f85416 in ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6
> #23 0xb77720a3 in +[ORFactory intVar:var:shift:] (self=0xb77f6d50,
> _cmd=0x8053a18, tracker=0x80f98e4, x=0x8178064, b=1) at ORFactory.m:214
> #24 0x0804994f in __main_block_invoke (.block_descriptor=0xbffff198, i=1) at
> main.m:29
> #25 0xb77730c1 in +[ORFactory intVarArray:range:with:] (self=0xb77f6d50,
> _cmd=0x8053a30, tracker=0x80f98e4, range=0x8160464, clo=0xbffff198)
> at ORFactory.m:284
> #26 0x08048fea in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff294) at main.m:29
So, this definitely shows that it's not finding the method.
> ORFactory is a factory class living in a shared lib ORFoundation
> The method invoked on ORModelI (a class living in a shared lib ORModeling) is
> indeed there and compiled just fine, but he's not
> finding it.
>
> Here is the method in question:
>
>
> -(void) addConstraint: (id<ORConstraint>) cstr
> {
> [_target trackConstraint:cstr];
> [_target add: cstr];
> }
Is it in a category? The class must have been loaded, if you're able to create
instances of it...
> So the argument is just an "id" adopting a specific protocol.
>
> The call site:
>
> if (b==0)
> 211 return x;
> 212 else {
> 213 id<ORIntVar> nv = [ORFactory intVar:tracker
> domain:RANGE(tracker,[x min] + b,[x max] + b)];
> 214 [tracker addConstraint:[ORFactory equal:tracker var:nv to:x
> plus:b annotation:DomainConsistency]];
> 215 return nv;
> 216 }
>
>
> where "tracker" is an ORModelI instance
>
> (gdb) po [tracker class]
> ORModelI
> (gdb)
>
> So far, it all looks fine. I'll decompose line 214 to check the argument
> being passed it (it should be a constraint (id<ORConstraint>)).
>
> Right now, I'm thinking that the issue may be related to the fact that caller
> and callee sit in different shared libraries and this is
> somehow causing an issue. Are there any special provisions I should be aware
> of when creating shared libraries on Linux that contain
> objective-C code when I will have inheritance and categories spanning shared
> lib boundaries?
This should be fine, the only problems can be if the methods are in a category
and the category hasn't loaded. After the start of main(), it should work
though.
David
-- Sent from my brain
- Re: Question, (continued)
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, David Chisnall, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Charalampos Chrysovalantis Emmanouilidis, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, David Chisnall, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, David Chisnall, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, David Chisnall, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Laurent Michel, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Patryk Laurent, 2013/03/06
- Re: Question, Charalampos Emmanouilidis, 2013/03/07