[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:59:50 +0100 |
On 12 Jun 2013, at 23:52, Maxthon Chan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Oh it just hit me - maybe you want libsupc++.a instead of .so, which (may)
> ask for libc++ to build.
No. You can not link libobjc.so against libsupc++.a, because the .a is not
position independent code.
You should also not link it against libc++. libobjcxx exists for situations
where this would be the only option.
David
-- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, (continued)
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Maxthon Chan, 2013/06/12
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, David Chisnall, 2013/06/13
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Frank Rehwinkel, 2013/06/13
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, David Chisnall, 2013/06/13
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Frank Rehwinkel, 2013/06/13
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Frank Rehwinkel, 2013/06/13
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, David Chisnall, 2013/06/14
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Maxthon Chan, 2013/06/14
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, David Chisnall, 2013/06/14
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?, Frank Rehwinkel, 2013/06/14
- Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?,
David Chisnall <=