Re: FreeBSD 9.1 missing libcxxrt - is it needed for objc2?

[David Chisnall]

Hi Frank,

Can you check whether libsupc++ from 9-STABLE works?  I believe that we're 
encountering a bug in the version script for libsupc++ in 9.1-RELEASE which is 
now fixed.  (If you have both installed, you can use libmap.conf to test - just 
tell it to use libsupc++.so instead of libcxxrt.so).

David

On 13 Jun 2013, at 16:45, Frank Rehwinkel <address@hidden> wrote:

> This worked.  I followed your advice back from
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067645.html
> 
> and ran make and make install for libcxxrt and libc++.  Then ran the install 
> steps again with targets in the basejail.
> 
> After a few more ports installs, the objc2, gnustep-make and gnustep-base all 
> built and installed.
> 
> This is great.  Thanks for all the help.
> 
> I also ran the 'make check' for -base and only 5 tests failed.  Four from 
> NSCalendarDate and one from NSTimeZone.  7903 tests passed.
> 
> So to recap the answer for the first question on this thread.  Yes, the 
> libcxxrt library is needed in a clean FreeBSD 9.1.  libcxxrt and libc++ can 
> be built following David's instructions in the above link.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:01 AM, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2013, at 01:25, Frank Rehwinkel <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > I've put MK_LIBCPLUSPLUS = yes in /etc/make.conf now.
> 
> This should be WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS, I believe, and should go in src.conf.  See 
> man src.conf for more information.
> 
> David
> 
> -- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


-- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA